About Me

Name: Anthony Rizzuto
Location: Orlando, FL
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Associated Pollyanna

In an AP piece released today titled “The Recovery plan: Shock and Awe for a Nation”, staff writers Nancy Benac and Calvin Woodward in what is clearly an editorial once again masquerading as news extol in detail the virtues of the so called “stimulus bill.” According to them the plan is “fast cash, and lots of it, but with a strategic view to the future.” How much of this fast cash is going to reach the average consumer which will ostensibly rekindle our economic furnace, according to the dynamic duo “Lower- and middle-income taxpayers will get an extra $13 a week in their paychecks this year, and about $8 a week next year.” Is an anemic 624 dollars a year enough to kick start the consumer engine? Common sense, which these two demonstrate a total lack of, says no. Neither will it save families from foreclosure as they predict, and it is dubious that this 13 dollars a week will allow people to maintain “COBRA” once they’ve been laid off. Let’s assume for the moment though that they are correct and the disease that would otherwise not have been diagnosed in fact is. Then what? Will they be denied care if they are too old or require cutting edge treatment due to restrictions imposed by the Health Czar created in the bill?

Apparently neither the authors nor some of the individuals they interviewed know anymore about the bill then those who wrote and passed it when they make statements like the following “If there is no effect and in six months we are talking about the same economy or a worse economy, I think it would be a devastating blow to the president, Democrats, and to liberal claims about what government can do." The bulk of this bill doesn’t take effect for months and in some cases years, don’t they understand that the term “government quick fix” is an oxymoron? However if money for “green jobs”, broadband service for rural areas and billions for the expansion of free condom distribution are the keys to reversing the economic downturn, then I guess the Messiah has finally come.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090214/ap_on_go_pr_wh/stimulus_stakes

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Amazing

After watching NBC political director Chuck Todd gush about the administration's abilty to get the so called stimulus bill out of congress "in only three weeks" I can't help but wonder what qualifications this network required for the post. Certainly a basic knowledge of history wasn't one of them. What the American people witnessed this past week was nothing less than the transformation of the Congress into a modern day "Politburo." Using Stalinist tactics the house leadership permitted no amendments, no debate, no input from the opposition party and none from the American people as they kept the final bill hidden until just before the floor vote in the "House of Representatives" which has become the latest oxymoron in the lexicon of government, right up there with "military intelligence."

How could anyone with even a modicum of intellectual honesty be amazed by such an "accomplishment." Is Mr. Todd also shocked that there is gambling and prostitution in Nevada? In addition to this nonsense we have leftist economist Paul Krugman crying like an unsatisfied lover that the "stimulus" isn't big enough, while Mr. Obama, the ringmaster of this "three ring circus" continues to maintain that he is acting in a bipartisan manner.

While this "Trojan horse" (pun intended) of a spending bill will no doubt sail through the Senate with the aid of three Republican quislings, one thing conservatives must stay focused on, "actions have consequences." We must make it our mission to be certain that those who lent their support to the sell out of this nation are not returned to office in the 2010 elections even if it means that the opposition party takes control of these seats. It may finally put the fear of voter repercussions into any and all who are no longer concerned with the voice of those who put them in power in the first place.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The truth about the Census

Here's the truth about Judd Gregg's decision to resign from the commerce dept. Hispanics and the Obama administration want to include illegal's and those with temporary visas in the new census which if allowed would dramatically shift the balance of power in many states including Florida and Ohio. Mr. Gregg is justifiably opposed to this which is why the administration removed the census from the Commerce Dept where it has always been. The next step no doubt and one that Democratic members of congress have been chomping at the bit for is to grant these illegals amnesty, giving them the right to vote. No doubt if in fact this does come to pass who they would vote for. Newt Gingrich said today that "If Republicans stand for this they are committing political suicide." If we as Americans allow this to stand we are committing national suicide. There are 47 million Americans who voted against this administration, it is past time for the "silent majority" to find it's voice.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"A RIOT IS AN UGLY THING!"

In view of the behavior of the administration and congress this video though prepared during the election is even more timely now.
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Transparency?

The only thing transparent about the Obama administration is their lack of it. It has just been revealed that the President stacked the deck at his press conference by pre-selecting those who would be permitted to ask questions, further it has been reported that he put a liberal talk host favorable to him in the front row. Can anyone imagine the outcry if a Republican administration had taken the same tack? The administration seems to be setting the tone from the top down as Republicans were shut out of the House-Senate conference on the spending bill by Reid and Pelosi. Further, rather than having an open debate on national health care Congress and the Administration buried it in the "stimulus bill". Is it any wonder the Democrats want to eliminate the public's access to information and opinions contrary to their own by threatening and no doubt soon implementing methods to shut down talk radio. Every day liberal commentators who decried what they called a lack of willingness on the part of Republicans to share power with their Democratic brethren now call on Democrats to shut the opposition out and roll over them. Then to cement this lopsided power grab the administration is attempting to hijack the census. Nixon would be envious.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Failed in the free market? Congress will legislate success!

For several weeks liberal talk show host Bill Press has had a number of like minded Senators on his program. Why? To encourage them to reintroduce the "Fairness Doctrine".  Senator Harkin: "'there you go, we gotta get the Fairness Doctrine back in law again." Press: "Alright, well good for you. You know, we gotta work on that, because they are just shutting down progressive talk from one city after another."

The one question Mr. Press doesn't answer is why. The reason is simple, they're losing money. That's how things work in a free market. If your successful you stay on the air, ratings in the toilet, off you go. Not to fear though Mr. Press "liberal" members of Congress are lining up to keep you on the air at the expense of programs that have an audience. Why is liberal talk failing? Camile Paglia supplies the answer: "To reach the radio audience (whether the topic is sports, politics or car repair), a host must have populist instincts and use the robust common voice. Too many Democrats have become arrogant elitists, speaking down in snide, condescending tones toward tradition-minded middle Americans whom they stereotype as rubes and buffoons."

As has been reported in many conservative outlets some of these representatives are looking to feather their own interests with the reintroduction of the doctrine. Paglia: "One of the nuggets I've gleaned from several radio sources is that Michigan Sen. Debbie Stabenow, who has been in the aggressive forefront of the campaign to reinstate the Fairness Doctrine, is married to Tom Athans, who works extensively with left-wing radio organizations and was once the executive vice-president of Air America, the liberal radio syndicate that, despite massive publicity from major media, has failed miserably to win a national audience. Stabenow's outrageous conflict of interest has of course been largely ignored by the prestige press, which should have been demanding that she recuse herself from all political involvement with this issue."

Fans of "Joey" should take heart, if a liberal Democrat somewhere owns or has a relative or friend who owns a piece of that cancelled show they'll find a way to put it back on the air.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Too little too late?

Yahoo News is the first media outlet outside of conservative commentators to point out that the stimulus bill is in trouble with voters. The only problem is the Senate has already passed it. Even if you don't listen to talk radio or watch Fox, anyone with common sense would have to know it was tanking based on Obama's "stimulus tour" to try and prop it up. The three Republican Senators who voted in favor of it have ceased answering their phones because of all the negative calls they've received and yet they went ahead and voted for it anyway. This is precisely the kind of behavior that caused Republicans to lose their majority two years ago and led to the defeat of the majority of so called "moderates" in the party. To echo the sentiments of leftist commentator Eugene Robinson in today’s Washington Post, "Bipartisanship is doing more harm than good". Of course this is not what Mr. Robinson was saying when his party was out of power but I hope all those on capital hill take note of the behavior of those on the left, follow suit and finally start to stand up for conservative principles. Rinos like Specter, Collins, and Snow are dinosaurs, part of an era that said you had to go along to get along. Well there is way too much at stake for that kind of behavior to be tolerated any longer. Yes we are a polarized nation and that is because so much hangs in the balance. The choices before us are black and white, left and right, and there is no gray in the middle. The sad fact is those three Senators could care less about what the majority of their constituents think and with the help of the MSM they have done an excellent job of hiding how voters really feel about this travesty which will take the nation on a hard left turn.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Misdirection

Misdirection is an art used by magicians to make you look at what they want you to see while they are doing something they don't want you to see. While most of us are focused on the "stimulus bill" which if passed will have long term detrimental effects on the economy, Barack Obama has, under cover of this debate, tried to do something that will have far more lasting repercussions on the U.S electorate, the moving of the census to the control of the White House. For some who may not know it, the census determines how voting districts are drawn up and with this tool in the hands of a totally political entity Obama can insure a Democratic majority in the House and Senate for at least the next ten years if not more. Such a move is not only alarming it is dangerous to the long term health of our "Democracy". If any of you are placing calls to your Senators and Congressmen encouraging them to vote against the "stimulus" bill make sure and let them know that you are equally opposed to the taking over of the census by the White House.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Destructive Center

That is the title of leftist economist Paul Krugman's piece in this morning's NY Times.  Mr. Krugman bemoans the fact that in Mr. Obama's efforts to garner bipartisan support for his "stimulus bill" he acquiesced to the will of the three or so Republicans who agreed to vote for it provided cuts were made in the spending provisions and replaced with tax cuts.
 
For once, Mr. Krugman and I are in agreement.  In their desire to be loved, Mr. Specter of Pennsylvania and Ms. Collins of Maine, have thrown their support behind a bill that is nothing more than payback to Democratic special interests who have been wondering in the wilderness for the last eight years waiting for their pound of flesh from the American taxpayer.  Without the support of moderate Republicans this bill would have fallen flat on it's face and would have had to be rewritten from scratch which is precisely what should have happened.  Even Senator "reach across the aisle" McCain knew it was best not to lend his support to this disaster in the making.  Thanks to those Republicans who are more concerned with their political futures in the left leaning states they currently represent this pork laden travesty now stands a good chance of passage, and worse the few cuts the "centrists" managed to negotiate will more than likely end up on the cutting room floor of the House-Senate conference committee.  Regardless, they will no doubt continue to support it. The mushy center of the Republican party is precisely what put us in the economic crisis in which we now find ourselves by their willingness to go along with much of the Democrat's demands during the Bush administration for fear of appearing "Partisan", a label their counterparts on the left wear proudly as they are committed to their beliefs, wrong though they may be.
 
It is past time for Republicans to reclaim the mantle of Ronald Regan and stand fast for the conservative principle that "The best government is the least government". Until that happens no recovery can take place.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The New Feminists

After reading an article today by Times columnist Judith Warner in which she recounts tales of women's fantasy's and dreams about the new Chief Executive, I couldn't help but wonder if this is really what women in the 60's and 70's were fighting for. As I recall they told us over and over that it was, "Time for women to be taken seriously", frankly that's a bit hard to do when I see this kind of nonsense from so called female elites.  
 
Ms. Warner writes "Many women — not too surprisingly — were dreaming about sex with the president. In these dreams, the women replaced Michelle with greater or lesser guilt or, in the case of a 62-year-old woman in North Florida, whose dream was reported to me by her daughter, found a fully above-board solution: “Michelle had divorced Barack because he had become ‘too much of a star.’ He then married my mother, who was oh so proud to be the first lady,” the daughter wrote me."
 
Can anyone imagine the reaction if Sara Palin had said something similar about George W. Bush?  Are there any fair minded individuals who don't believe such a statement would have made the front page or cover of every major publication and the top headline of every news outlet? Women on the left have consistently made every effort to set themselves back over the gains they've made in the last 20 years, from their support of those politicians who have openly harassed women, to those who have been accused of rape, provided they supported the leftist female legislative agenda. I find it hard to believe that when our grandmother's were put in chains and thrown in prison that this was what they had in mind when they fought for "Women's Suffrage"
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Partisan?

According to that bastion of impartiality, The New York Times, "In stimulus deal, partisanship is big winner". At first glance I thought that they had to be referring to the Democrats in congress, after all it was their leadership that drafted it and filled it with more pork than a Jimmy Dean sausage factory, but of course not, the Times was referring to the Republicans for their failure to drink the Kool-Aid. This is of course how the last president was portrayed, as a pure partisan, because he refused to go along with what the other party wanted lock stock and barrel. In other words, if you vote for or support any legislation drafted by Democrats you are bipartisan, otherwise you're the devil trying to impede the good will of the people. Since that is what the Times and NBC believe and want us to believe, why don't they just come out and say it, clearly, "Liberal good, conservative bad" and have done with it. Surely they can't be concerned that someone at this late date would accuse them of being partisan when it's abundantly clear that they are and have been for decades. No point in beating the dead horse of what's wrong with the bill in question when according to those who know so much better than the general public, it's perfect. The icing on the cake was the pronouncement by the chief executive that it should pass if for no other reason than the fact that "I won the election". I recall when that same line was used by the last occupant of the White House in 04, the left had apoplexy.  I guess I should tone down my rhetoric, I wouldn't want to be accused of being partisan.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Observations

Pork and the "Stimulus Bill": What is there to say that hasn't already been said, a few things. First it would appear that pork is good as long as it's Democratic as opposed to Republican pork. If that were the case we wouldn't be in the mess we are currently in. Republicans spent like Democrats on drugs for the last eight years, look where it's gotten us. For all the arguing and posturing over this so called spending bill, the dirty truth is it will have no impact on the current financial crisis although according to the CBO it very likely will cause more problems down the road reducing GDP. Bush and the congress passed a mortgage bail out bill last July and according to the latest reports that won't kick in for another eighteen months and that is considered lightning speed according to congress. The bottom line, if you are counting on the government to bail you out, that is unless you are a bank or an auto manufacturer, you have a better chance playing the lotto or waiting for that jolly old elf in the red suit to come crashing through your chimney. The one thing that can be counted on is things are going to get substantially worse before the smoke clears.

Bipartisanship: That was the rallying cry of the media and the Dems for the last eight years. The truth is, that only matters when they are out of power. According to Ms. Pelosi, it's unimportant and there isn't time for it. No, it is far more important to push this behemoth through so free condom distribution can start immediately and construction can begin on new schools in districts where there are no students to fill them.  http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0209/18514.html

Taxes: One wonders what the impetus is to end the Bush tax cuts for the so called rich when it is abundantly clear that the majority of Mr. Obama's appointees are in such desperate need of them.

Change: That is what you will have left in your wallets and purses by the time Obama and the Democrats are through.

 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

J.G. THE REAL AUTHOR OF 911, AND THE DEPRESSION OF 08

Keith Olbermann of MSNBC's countdown listed Peggy Noonan (a woman I have not been a fan of for some time) as the bronze recipient of his daily hate list, "Worst Persons In The World" this evening  for having the audacity to credit George Bush with keeping us safe from attack for the last seven years.  Olbermann said, "Who was President on 911? George Bush did not keep us safe in 2001, in fact he failed at that more than any of his 42 predecessors."  Having watched Mr. Olbermann off and on for a number of years it would be wrong to call him stupid, he is anything but, however, it would be fair to say he is either willfully ignorant, or a conscious liar.

The Bush administration came in with more than one hand tied behind it's back thanks in large part to the actions of former Deputy Attorney General Jamie Gorelick.  It was Ms. Gorelick who was responsible for putting a wall between Federal agencies that kept them from communicating.  Specifically the inability to communicate about domestic vs international threats which became one in the same on 911. While she initially protested her innocence in the matter stating that such walls had existed as far back as the 1980's, Ms. Gorelick, who served on the 911 commission, eventually had to "recuse herself from reviewing her own role in the regulation of information about terrorist activities."

The wall she put in place by means of a memorandum kept "anti-terror investigators from accessing the computer of Zacarias Moussaoui, the 20th hijacker, already in custody on an immigration violation."  Had they been able to do so, the events of 911 may very well have been averted.  The reason Ms. Gorelick instituted this policy was to cover the rather large posterior of her boss by preventing the FBI from investigating "reported allegations of contributions to the Clinton-Gore campaign from foreign sources, involving the likes of John Huang and Charlie Trie."  Had Mr. Clinton shown more interest in national security than his own re-election and the contents of his humidor, (which he used on a number of occasions for purposes for which they were never intended) 3000 plus lives would have been saved. Though no one of prominence chooses to say so, I will, the blame for 911 lies squarely at the feet of Bill Clinton, Jamie Gorelick and the other members of his administration. What is most frightening is that Barack Obama is considering elevating Ms. Gorelick from her former title of Deputy Attorney General to the top spot itself.

In the intervening years since she left office, Gorelick was intimately involved in the making of yet another national disaster, the housing, mortage, and credit crisis from which we currently suffer.  From 1997 to 2003 she served as Vice Chairman of the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae).  In an interview conducted by Business Week in 2002 she is quoted as saying, "We believe we are managed safely. We are very pleased that Moody's gave us an A-minus in the area of bank financial strength -- without a reference to the government in any way. Fannie Mae is among the handful of top-quality institutions." One year later, Government Regulators "accused Fannie Mae of improper accounting to the tune of $9 billion in unrecorded losses" and the rest as they say is history. If this is the kind of "change" Barack Obama intends to bring to the nation I for one would just as soon pass.
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

PASS THE GAS, TAX

Livestock breeders may soon be assessed fees for flatulence caused by cows and pigs if a law proposed by the EPA goes into effect. This is the result of a Supreme Court ruling in 07 that classified "greenhouse gases" casused by belching and flatulence as "air pollution." As the  Federal coffers grow thinner one wonders if the EPA will stop at the four legged. With the introduction of a National Healthcare System, how long will it be before those suffering from IBS are assessed for their contribution to "global warming? The rest of us may not be far behind, as the green meanies are attempting to have carbon dioxide, i.e. the air we expel, classified as a pollutant. There is a silver lining in every cloud though as this may enable millions of Americans to set up their own "carbon credit" scam like former VP Al Gore.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive