About Me

Name: Anthony Rizzuto
Location: Orlando, FL
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Moonshiners, new political force to be reckoned with

I was flipping around the dial tonight and just for the heck of it stopped on "Nightline."  I haven't watched it since Koppel left.  What caught my attention was a story they were doing on locally produced whisky, aka moonshine.  Moonshine is one of those folksy things you hear rumors about from friends or relatives or see depicted on tv shows like "The Dukes of Hazzard" or "The Andy Griffith Show".  It's a part of American folklore.  The one thing that kept coming to mind as I watched this program was the timing.  "Why"  I wondered, "are they doing a program on this kind of topic the day before Thanksgiving?" " Why do it at all?"  Then it hit me like a ton of bricks.  The area they kept showing in the report was southern Virginia.  The correspondent kept referring to moonshine as being a tradition "in this part of the country."  They even interviewed a guy, naturally white, even though running a still is color blind, who confirmed that yes indeedy at one time he ran a still, as did his daddy and his daddy's daddy.  It goes back for generations.  Some of you at this point may be thinking "So what?"  Well here's the so what.  What the report does not directly say but implies so strongly they might as well have, is that most of the people in the southern part of Virginia are white, moonshining whisky drinking rubes.  So why go after them?  Because the msm would like you to believe that these "rubes" are the reason that a Republican was just elected governor of the state.  What other explanation could there be?  It couldn't possibly be that people have finally woken up and realized what a mistake they made, no no. This time the "rubes" were motivated because they wanted to stick it in the eye of that "darkie" in the White house.  Well doesn't it follow that if they're white, make and drink whisky, that they must be racist as well, and of course that and that alone is the reason, well the new manufactured reason, ( some of you may remember that up until now it was because the Dems had a weak candidate who disavowed Obama until the last minute) that the Republican won in the until all to recently, newly minted "Blue State" of Virginia.  None of this was ever directly stated, but my oh my how they do imply. Remember you heard it hear first, if in fact you do hear it anywhere else. 

Happy Thanksgiving.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The truth comes out at last

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Dems attempt to drown America with Kennedy Care

Democrats should not be allowed to push through a bill which would effectively destroy one of the best health care systems in the world in the name of someone who's morality was, on many occasions, lacking.  To do so would effectively condemn the old and infirmed to  the same fate as Mary Jo Kopechne.  Americans should not be subjected to Chappaquiddick part two.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

No surrender no retreat.

Conservatives who may be relishing the sweet taste of victory due to the administration's so called removal of a public option in health care reform should not be lulled into a false sense of security.  The concept of co-op insurance with government oversight sounds strangely familiar, not unlike Freddie and Fannie and we all know what happened there.  This has the sense of a boondoggle in the making and bankruptcy in the future.  If the legislature has any involvement what so ever there is no doubt that abject failure is what we have to look forward to.  Not to beat a dead horse but some measure of torte reform needs to be a part of the overall plan and congress needs to be kept from putting their very sticky fingers in the pie.  Yet another example of government ineptitude was the partial privatization of the postal service and they continue to lose money year after year.  Conservatives need to continue to press all branches of government until there is a definitive plan on the table rather than ethereal promises so that we have to ability to judge a concrete proposal on it's true merits.  Most important is the truth of what the actual cost to tax payers will be and how they're going to pay for it.  Until that time we cannot afford to rest on our Laurels.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Band-aid on a gaping wound.

The President and his party are in a rush to ramrod a plan for national health care down the throats of an unwilling public with some assistance from liberal members of the opposition party all for the sake of controlling rising health care costs.  The truth of the matter is regardless of what plan they come up with that will never happen.  The dramatic rise in the cost of health care has little to do with Doctors, hospitals or insurance companies.  The culprit is and has always been trial lawyers.   

Certainly there are physicians guilty of malpractice and the same can be said of hospitals and the victims of such negligence deserve to be compensated.  At one time such compensation was difficult to come by as the medical profession was seen by many as incapable of doing any wrong.  However that pendulum has swung to the opposite extreme and the nation as a whole has become grossly litigious. 

Tune in any channel and you are guaranteed to see at least one ad every hour on the hour by someone claiming to be " for the people", read that for those who are looking for quick buck.  More often than not both clients and attorneys think nothing of trying to squeeze as much as they can out of someone in the medical community.  The result has been increased costs to the consumer for everything from office visits to surgical procedures and every kind of treatment in between because someone ultimately has to pay for the increasing costs to health care providers for malpractice insurance, and that someone is "John Q. Public.' 

Both Democrats and Republicans are up to their necks in contributions from the Trial Lawyer lobby so the odds of congress passing Torte reform that would reign in frivolous law suits are slim to none, but, until this is addressed there is no hope of reducing the ever increasing costs of medical treatment and rationing is not and never will be the answer.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Healthcare report from across the pond

I am currently in the UK visiting friends and as this country is already under the thumb of socialized medicine it seemed appropriate to report on what America has to look forward to if Mr. Obama has his way.  Those who suffer the most in Britain as a result of health care rationing are women.  It was amazing to discover that a majority of British females have never had a mammogram.  Worse, they have no clue how to conduct a self examination of their breasts.  The modus operandi here is not prevention but treatment after cancer develops.  By that point, for many, when treatment does come, it is too late. 
 
Gynecological exams which American women receive twice annually between the ages of 18 and forty and once annually for those over forty are limited to once every two years.  Conditions such as fibroids which in many cases can be easily  treated by laser thus allowing women to keep their reproductive organs in tact are not covered by the National Health System.  Those who suffer from the condition must submit to full hysterectomies in order to reduce costs regardless of the long term effects such radical surgery may have.  There is no empathy for the condition of the patient, the only concern is the cost is to the government.  In short, those who cannot afford private insurance are left to be butchered by the state. 
 
For the sake of our mothers, wives and daughters we must oppose the President's proposed overhaul of our health care system by any and all legal means available.  By way of a Freudian slip Mr. Obama told the truth about what is to come if he has his way while addressing the Children's National Medical Center in Washington today when he said, "The reforms we seek would bring greater competition, choice, savings and inefficiencies to our health care system"
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Unqualified

During the campaign of 08 we heard over and over from then candidate Obama that if we would only sit down, talk with our enemies and sing "kum by ya", they would miraculously be transformed from enemies to allies.  Now that he as taken office as commander in chief we see the results of his foreign policy naivete.  Russia told him to pound sand when he offered to remove the missile defense system from Eastern Europe in return for their intervention in Iran.  Chavez has become more strident and tied itself more closely to Russia. Worse, Iran has just test fired a ballistic missile capable of reaching Israel, U.S bases in the Mideast and our allies in Europe and Obama has been in office less than six months.  Even Democrats in congress and his own FBI director realize how dangerous his shoot from the hip polices are as they joined Republicans today in rejecting Obma's plans to close Guantanamo and relocate terrorists to domestic soil.  Not since the days of James Earl Carter have we seen such incompetence in the oval office.

Clearly this man is unqualified to deal with foreign policy.  Over and over he has been the first to undermine the reputation of his own nation with constant criticism of policies that led the U.S to become the worlds lone superpower.  If Obama has such disdain for his own country how can he expect to garner respect among enemies and allies alike.  Our only hope to survive this debacle is to hold Congress's feet to the fire so that they will continue to reject the reckless policies of the Obama administration until conservatives find their voice and take back the Republican party from the mushy centrists that have brought this nation to the brink of disaster.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama: Self sacrifice supersedes individual achievement

In a commencement address to graduates of  Arizona State University, President Obama said the following:

" Did you study business? Why not help our struggling non-profits find better, more effective ways to serve folks in need. Nursing? Understaffed clinics and hospitals across this country are desperate for your help. Education? Teach in a high-need school; give a chance to kids we can't afford to give up on - prepare them to compete for any job anywhere in the world. Engineering? Help us lead a green revolution, developing new sources of clean energy that will power our economy and preserve our planet." 

Is that what parents have slaved and sacrificed to send their children to school for, to increase the size of the welfare state?  Or did they they send them there so that they would develop the tools that would make them self sustaining so they wouldn't end up back on their doorsteps at age 30 with their husbands wives and children?

According to Obama we are in the shape we are in because for generations we pursued individual achievement at the expense of the common good and the only way out of it is to suppress that desire in future generations.  The following could just as easily come out of his mouth:  "Don’t set out to raze all shrines—you’ll frighten men. Enshrine mediocrity, and the shrines are razed."  Those are the words of Ayn Rand's collectivist character Ellsworth Toohey in the Fountainhead.  After the statements that were made at ASU there can be no doubt that is who now sits in the White House.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

No more Reagan? No more Bush!

This past weekend Jeb Bush stated that "it's time for the Republican Party to give up its "nostalgia" for the heyday of the Reagan era and look forward, even if it means stealing the winning strategy deployed by Democrats in the 2008 election."  Bush went on to say " President Obama's message of hope and change during the 2008 campaign clearly resonated with Americans."  Statements like that show just how out of Touch Mr. Bush is with history and his party.  It was Obama who co-opted the Reagan message of hope, change and tax cuts and if Bush is that blind he has no business running for the party's nomination.  The Bush family has always been part of the country club / Rockefeller wing of the party and that hasn't changed.  It was his father that benefited from Regan's legacy and the first thing he did after taking office was to distance himself from the man who put him there.  His younger son won the nomination in 2000 by running on the Reagan agenda and the longer he was in office the further he got away from it, along with those in congress.   The reason McCain lost is because he completely abandoned the principles of Reagan and many conservatives failed to turn up at the polls as a result.  How can Bush and the rest of these so called leaders possibly believe that the key to winning back the oval office is to go even further down that path?  They say they are going to go on a listening tour?  Well perhaps they should all stock up on "miracle ears" because they are stone deaf to the members of their own party.  The icing on the cake was R.I.N.O. Republican now Democrat Arlen Specter blaming Jack Kemp's death on conservative principles.  I would rather see us wander the political dessert for as long as it takes to rid ourselves of these kind of influences than to take a chance on putting one of them in a position of power simply for the purpose of having a "Republican" in the White House.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Mother Earth can take care of herself

As I mentioned in my previous post "Too many people", those on the left have been predicting dire consequences for decades due to "overpopulation" and have been chastising us to limit reproductivity.  Well mother earth has a way of dealing with over population herself as she did in 1918 with the Spanish flu pandemic taking 40,000,000 of the populace out of circulation.  Now it appears we may very well be on the brink of yet another such pandemic and while we have tools to fight it that were not in place during the last one, over use of antibiotics may have rendered us impotent in combating the current threat.  The earth is quite capable of taking anything we throw at it as the late George Carlin stated on more than one occasion: 

"The planet has been through a lot worse than us. Been through all kinds of things worse than us. Been through earthquakes, volcanoes, plate tectonics, continental drift, solar flares, sun spots, magnetic storms, the magnetic reversal of the poles…hundreds of thousands of years of bombardment by comets and asteroids and meteors, worldwide floods, tidal waves, worldwide fires, erosion, cosmic rays, recurring ice ages…And we think some plastic bags, and some aluminum cans are going to make a difference? The planet…the planet…the planet isn’t going anywhere. WE ARE!"

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Let's make a deal

After leading his boss to defeat, McCain Campaign chairman Steve Schmidt is now encouraging the Republican party to go even further in abandoning it's principles in order to increase support.  Schmidt urged fellow Republicans on Friday to "warm up to gay rights and warned that the GOP risks becoming the "religious party" with its opposition to same-sex marriage."  He went on to say "that Republicans need to reach out, not only to gay voters, but young voters and Hispanics."  Let's cut to the chase,  what Mr. Schimdt wants Republicans (read that conservatives) to do is: Support Gay marriage, support amnesty for illegals and cut deals with younger voters by giving them free tuition.  Were the party to take his advice, what at that point would separate Republicans from Democrats?  While we're at it why don't we disavow support for tax cuts, a strong defense, the family, and law enforcement?  Better yet, why not dissolve the party altogether and become Democrats?
 
What Schmidt and others of his ilk are proposing is to follow rather than lead, the same way Republican members of the House and Senate chose to follow the traditions of tax and spend rather than what voters sent them there to do.  Instead of conservatives abandoning their principles to the will of the mob, I would suggest Mr. Schmidt reach out to the other side completely and join the party that he is obviously more comfortable with.  The last thing the party needs is another R.I.N.O who simply doesn't understand that the reason for it's losses in the last four years was the abandonment of it's core values.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Orwellian

Imagine my surprise when I awoke yesterday to discover that according to Janet Napolitano, secretary of homeland security, I am considered a potential threat to the government purely on the basis that I am opposed to giving illegal immigrants amnesty and I am pro-life.  I would imagine that many of you reading this fall into the same category.  Worse, those who are returning to civilian life after having served this nation with honor are considered to be the most potentially dangerous to the new standard of "national security" being imposed on free thinking Americans by members of the radical left now in charge of the government.  Can anyone imagine the howling that would have spread through the mainstream media had the Bush administration proposed similar measures for those who opposed the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan?  While the new standards on so called potential domestic terrorists should be taken seriously, no one, no one, should be intimidated into suppressing their strongly held beliefs.  No one on either side should resort to violence of any kind.  Having said that, it would appear that it is the left not the right that Ms. Napolitano should be concerning herself with based on former congressman Tom Tancredo's reception at the University of North Carolina last night.  Mr. Tancredo was invited there to speak in support of his view against illegal immigration.  He had barely started his speech when he was interrupted by violent protesters who broke a window in the auditorium while chanting "no one is illegal".  This is what those of us in opposition to the Obama administration's policies are facing, being arrested by a paranoid left wing administration, or being physically silenced by those who fear more than anything, the right of free speech.  While I would never incite to violence I sure as hell am not going to take it from the other side without responding in kind and I will never submit to illegal habeas corpus simply for having an opinion that does not fall in line with the policies of this or any administration.  That is not what my friends and family sacrificed their lives for when they fought in defense of this nation. 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The second shoe

On February 12th of this year regarding the move of the census from the commerce dept to the executive branch I made the prediction in my piece "The truth about the census" http://torchlight.blogtownhall.com/2009/02/12/the_truth_about_the_census.thtml that "The next step no doubt and one that Democratic members of congress have been chomping at the bit for is to grant these illegals amnesty, giving them the right to vote."  Now that shoe is about to drop.  According to an article by Julia Preston in today's New York Times, "President  Obama plans to begin addressing America's immigration system this year, including looking for a path for illegal immigrants to become legal." 

 
While many are cautioning the president to wait until later to deal with this issue siting current high unemployment as the reason, he intends to push for it none the less.  The reason no doubt is to forestall a resurgence by the Republicans in congress in 2010 by ensuring a new crop of  "indentured voters" turn out in mass to maintain or increase his power base.  His timing may be fortunate for the opposition as conservatives in both parties may be able to band together to stem the tide, but without a strong public outcry that is not likely to happen.  It is critical that those opposed to amnesty and the attempt by the administration to gerrymander congress for the Democrats that voters make their opinions known to their representatives, particularly those up for re-election.  If not, we should expect to see liberal majorities in both houses and at the executive for a decade or longer.

http://www.mercurynews.com/politics/ci_12102370?source=rss

 

 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Don't believe the labels

For years conservatives have been told that columnists like Thomas Friedman and David Brooks are conservatives by those in the mainstream press.  Often when quoting them they will use statements such as "Conservative Thomas Friedman or Conservative David Brooks." My question is, conservative compared to who?  In the last election those in the MSM stated repeatedly that if only those in the Republican party would follow the model of Brooks and Friedman we would have won the election.  It appears that the MSM has been using the strategy that if you repeat a lie often enough it becomes the truth.  Brooks and Friedman are no more conservative in their philosophy than Bill Clinton and never have been. They have consistently been derisive towards the Regan model declaring it passe and have stated time and time again that if Republicans (read that conservatives) wish to regain control of the government they need to moderate their views.  The Regan model is no more passe than the ten commandments and it is just as timeless. 
 
Regan believed that the money you earned was yours and that you knew far better how to spend it than the bureaucrats in Washington.  He saw government intrusion into the private sector not as a speed bump but a road block and revived an economy that had been struggling for years under the leadership of "moderate" Republicans and liberal Democrats by deregulating industry.  Now Friedman and his ilk are championing the cause of tying both hands behind industry's back by supporting the "cap and trade" system proposed by Democrats in congress and supported by the Obama administration.  Mr. Friedman showed his true colors when he wrote the following: "Since the opponents of cap-and-trade are going to pillory it as a tax anyway, why not go for the real thing — a simple, transparent, economy-wide carbon tax?"  What is the point of such a tax?  On the surface it's proponents will tell you that it is to stem the tide of "Global Warming", but the truth is that it is being proposed to put a strangle hold on the free market.  To put those who "know best" in charge of the daily lives of every American by controlling down to the smallest detail how we live their lives.  That is the evil truth behind the "Green Movement" which is nothing more than a thinly disguised "Red Movement."  Communists lost the cold war and the battle of ideas in the eighties and are using the environment as nothing more than a means to the same old end, total government control.  Contrary to what Friedman, Brooks and others would have you believe it was only when Republicans abandoned the Regan model that they lost control of government, in more ways than one.  So when anyone in the MSM touts those with a liberal agenda as conservative beware, in politics there is no law that demands truth in labelling. 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Too many People?

According to science and technology advisor Nina Federoff humans have exceeded the earth's "limits of sustainability."  This is the second claim in a week by those in authority.  Only last week a member of the Brown govt in the UK stated that they needed to prune their population down to 30,000,000.  Claims such as this have made headlines for decades and yet the huge collapse of resources they predict have failed to come to pass.  I have a recommendation to those who feel there are too many people on the planet, practice what you preach and eliminate yourselves as part of the population immediately.  This will certainly prove you have the courage of your convictions.  If you feel that strongly about it take your loved ones with you.  At the very least see that they are sterilized before you go.  That will at least eliminate the part of the population that thinks it knows what's best for everyone else. 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive